← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/14553/2018disposed offdismissed for default

The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Osmanabad v. Sakharam Vithal Bansode And ANR

2019-06-20Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14553 OF 2018 IN FAST/28513/2018 WITH CA/14555/2018 IN FAST/28612/2018 WITH CA/14557/2018 IN FAST/28609/2018 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD

VERSUS

SAKHARAM VITHAL BANSODE AND ANR ...

Mr. A.M. Phule, AGP for the applicant Mr. A.S. More, Advocate for the respondent No.1 ...

CORAM :

SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

DATE :

20th JUNE, 2019 PER COURT :

Issue notice to respondents. Learned Advocate Mr. A.S. More waives notice for respondent No.1. As regards delay condonation application is concerned no notice is required to issue to respondent No.2, who is a formal respondent.

Heard both sides.

Present application is filed for getting the delay of 1096 days condoned in filing First Appeal. Though strictly some of the duration from

CA_14553_2018 the delay has not been properly explained, yet by taking liberal view for the reasons mentioned in para Nos.2 to 4 the delay is condoned. Application stands allowed. Registry to verify the appeal and register the same. Place it for consideration on 06.08.2019.

( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J. ) agd