← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/6072/2022delay condonatedrejected

Ex. Engineer, Beed Irrigation Div. Beed Under Gmidc, Aurangabad And ORS v. Uttam S/O Tatyrao Karpe

2022-11-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

{1} 33-CA-6072-2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6072 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 28704 OF 2021 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BEED IRRIGATION DIVISION BEED UNDER GMIDC AURANGABAD AND OTHERS

VERSUS

UTTAM S/O TATYRAO KARPE ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. B.R. Surwase Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.D. Bhise ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 14th November, 2022.

PER COURT :

.

Heard. Issue notice to the respondents.

2.

The learned Counsel - Mr. R.D. Bhise waives service of notice for respondent.

3.

The learned Counsel for the applicants undertakes to mention the delay period of 981 days instead of 565 days in prayer clause 'B'.

4.

Heard rival submissions.

5.

The applicant - acquiring body is seeking condonation Pooja K.

{2} 33-CA-6072-2022 of delay of 981 days which appears to be caused due to obtaining approval at various stages.

6.

There is no strong objection from other side. 7.

As such, the delay of 981 days stands condoned. 8.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of ofce objections, if any.

9.

The application accordingly disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Pooja K.