Vandana W/O Rajendra Gore v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5220 OF 2016 (Vandana w/o Rajendra Gore Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another) ---- Mr. N.D. Kendre, Advocate holding for Mr. U.L. Momale, Advocate for the applicant Mr. S.W. Munde, A.P.P. for the respondent/State ---- CORAM :

S.S. SHINDE AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 26th September, 2016 PER COURT :

Heard.

2.

Upon perusal of the contents of the FIR, prima facie, the offence is disclosed. There is allegation of demand of the amount and also that the investigation team, after verifying the conversation in the digital voice recorder, arranged the trap. The defence taken by the applicant that the said amount was demanded and accepted towards taxes of the Gram Panchayat, cannot be considered. No case is made out for quashing of the FIR. In the circumstances, the criminal application stands rejected.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE npj/criapln5220-2016