Subhash Vitthal Suryawanshi And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Osmanabad And ORS
1 43-CA.13114-23 & ors (43 to 49).odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 43 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13114 OF 2023 IN FAST/27381/2023 MAHADEO BHIMRAO KADAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS AND 44 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13973 OF 2023 IN FAST/27379/2023 YAMUNABAI LIMBAJI SHINDE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS AND 45 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13975 OF 2023 IN FAST/27393/2023 JANABAI KUNDLIK KADAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS AND 46 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13976 OF 2023 IN FAST/27385/2023 ARUN SOUDAGAR KADAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS AND 47 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13980 OF 2023 IN FAST/27390/2023 SUBHASH VITTHAL SURYAWANSHI AND ORS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS AND 48 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14027 OF 2023 IN FAST/27427/2023
2 43-CA.13114-23 & ors (43 to 49).odt ANKUSH SHANKAR PAWAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS AND 49 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14031 OF 2023 IN FAST/27365/2023 SHIVAJI BHAGWAN LONDHE AND ORS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Ingale Vivekanand V. AGPs for Respondents/State : Mrs. M. N. Ghanekar, Mr. S. V. Hange, respectively.
...
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 04.11.2025 PER COURT :- 1.
In this group of appeals, the length of the delay ranges from 2674 to 2765. Contesting party/respondent No.3 has not caused any appearance despite service. The averments of the applications are uncontroverted. There is nothing to disbelieve the contents of the applications. No malafides can be inferred for causing delay in preferring appeals. It is desirable to condone the delay on certain conditions. It reveals from record that applications for condonation of delay was filed along with appeals on 25.08.2023. The first order is solicited on 11.08.2025. Applicants are unable to explain the lapses on
3 43-CA.13114-23 & ors (43 to 49).odt their part. They are not entitled to statutory benefits for this period.
2.
The delay stands condoned on condition that applicants shall not be entitled interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period as well as for the lapses from 25.08.2023 to 11.08.2025.
First Appeals 3.
Appellants shall furnish details of the appeals preferred by the acquiring body.
4.
List present appeals along with those appeals which were filed by acquiring body.
5.
Leave to correct grounds.
(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) ...
vmk/-