Barku Rama Songal v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Ahmednagar And Others

976-CA-12448-21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12448 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 28927 OF 2021 Govinda Rama Khadke ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra and Others ..RESPONDENTS AND CA/12442/2021 IN FAST/28757/2021 AND CA/12444/2021 IN FAST/28911/2021 AND CA/12445/2021 IN FAST/28923/2021 AND CA/12446/2021 IN FAST/28920/2021 AND CA/12447/2021 IN FAST/28909/2021 AND CA/12449/2021 IN FAST/28931/2021 AND CA/12450/2021 IN FAST/28873/2021 AND CA/12451/2021 IN FAST/28903/2021 AND CA/12452/2021 IN FAST/28905/2021 ....

Mr. R.K. Temkar, Advocate for applicants Mr. A.M. Phule, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 3 ....

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J.

DATED : 24th NOVEMBER, 2021 PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

Learned A.G.P. strongly objects to condone the delay. 3.

There is delay of 3435 days in preferring the appeals for enhancement of compensation awarded under the concerned land references. 1 / 2

976-CA-12448-21.odt Admittedly, the State has also filed appeals challenging the very awards. Had notices been issued in the appeals preferred by the State, the appellants herein would have an extended time to file cross objection within a period of one month from the receipt of notice of the appeals preferred by the State. 4.

In view of the same, present applications for condonation of delay are allowed in terms of prayer clause (B), provided the applicants shall not be entitled for component of interest for the delayed period. ( R.G. AVACHAT, J. ) SSD 2 / 2