← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/9983/2015withdrawn

Suhas Harichandrrao Phulambrikar And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2015-09-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar2 pages

9981.15wp+ FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ WRIT PETITION NO. 9981 OF 2015 UMAKANT SHIVSHANKARAPPA SHIVANKAR AND ANOTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr.Palodkar D.P.

AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.S.B. Pulkundwar. Advocate for Respondent 2&3 : Mr.Karad Atul.

...

& WRIT PETITION NO. 9982 OF 2015 UJAWALABAI ASHOK CHAUDHARY AND ANOTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr.Palodkar D.P.

AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.S.K. Kadam Advocate for Respondent 2 & 3 : Mr.Karad Atul. ...

& WRIT PETITION NO. 9983 OF 2015 SUHAS S/O HARICHANDRRAO PHULAMBRIKAR AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr.Palodkar D.P.

AGP for Respondents/State: Mrs.S.G. Chincholkar. Advocate for Respondent 2 & 3 : Mr.Karad Atul. ...

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ.

Dated: SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 ...

9981.15wp+ Not on Board, taken on Board.

Learned Counsel for the respondent - Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad, on instructions of the Assistant Director of Town Planning, serving in the Municipal Corporation, makes a statement that the public notice dated 24th September, 2015 at Exh.F at page 92 of the compilation of Writ Petition No.9981/2015 will not be acted upon for a period of ten days from today. Learned Counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Civil Court.

Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

We make it clear that we have not entered into merits of the matters and even the statement of the Counsel for the respondent - Municipal Corporation, which is recorded above is not on merits and the same is without prejudice to rights and contentions of the respondent - corporation. Parties to act upon authenticated copy of this order.

(A.M. BADAR, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J) kadam/