Arjunsingh Chainsingh Raghuwanshi v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ WRIT PETITION NO. 2611 OF 2017 ARJUNSINGH CHAINSINGH RAGHUWANSHI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Bhagure Ashok C. (Absent).

Addl.GP for Respondent/State: Mr.P.S. Patil.

...

AGP for Respondent/State: Mr.S.W. Munde.

...

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & V.L. ACHLIYA,JJ.

Dated: DECEMBER,18, 2017 ...

Though the matter is circulated for urgent admission, the advocate for the petitioner is absent. The petitioner is assailing the order of the tribunal dismissing the original application.

2.

The learned AGP relies on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Union of India Vs. Bakshi Ram (1990(2) SCC 426) to submit that even if the person is granted benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act, the conviction still subsists.

The

2611.17wp conviction remains untouched and the stigma of conviction is not obliterated.

3.

As none appears for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

(V.L.ACHLIYA,J) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J) kadam/