Chandrakant Ramrao Katale v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} wp11195.17.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11195 OF 2017 Chandrakant s/o Ramrao Katale Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. S.S. Deshmukh, advocate for petitioner.

Mr. S.P. Sonpawale, A.G.P. for respondents 1 and 2. Mr. M.B. Bharaswadkar, advocate for respondent no.3. CORAM : R.M.BORDE & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.

DATE : 13th SEPTEMBER, 2017 PER COURT:

In view of the fact that the process of election is already set in motion and, considering the provisions of Article 243(O) of the Constitution of India, no interference is called for. Writ petition stands rejected.

SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE dyb