← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3269/2023disposed off

Raju Raosaheb Salve v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

2023-03-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh2 pages

16, 19 n 25 WP.3264.2023 ORS.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

16 WRIT PETITION NO.3264 OF 2023 BALASAHEB APPA PHULMALI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh S. Bhosale. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. P. S. Patil.

...

AND 19 WRIT PETITION NO.3269 OF 2023 RAJU RAOSAHEB SALVE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh S. Bhosale. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S. K. Tambe.

...

AND 25 WRIT PETITION NO.3281 OF 2023 SATISH MAILARI KATKE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh S. Bhosale. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S. G. Karlekar. ...

CORAM :

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATE :

27th March, 2023.

16, 19 n 25 WP.3264.2023 ORS.odt Per Court:

1.

All these Petitioners are identically placed and their representations, dated 22nd August, 2022 addressed to Respondent Nos.1 and 2, are pending.

2.

The Petitioners' issue is as regards quantum of pay-scale that is being extended to the Petitioners. In similar circumstances, this Court has passed an order on 9th February, 2021 in Writ Petition No.14799 of 2017, directing the competent authority to deal with the representation.

3.

In view of the above, these Petitions are disposed off. Respondent No.2 shall follow the procedure laid down in law and give a reasonable opportunity of hearing to all the stakeholders, while deciding the representations of the Petitioners dated 22nd August, 2022 on their own merits and preferably within 75 days from today. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] [ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ] nga