← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/11067/2023disposed off

Sudhakar Ukrda Tidke And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Others

2023-09-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade3 pages

- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 934 WRIT PETITION NO.11021 OF 2023 MANGESH SADASHIV KADAM AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO.11067 OF 2023 SUDHAKAR UKRDA TIDKE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO.11070 OF 2023 YOGESH SHIVAJI PATIL AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO.11069 OF 2023 RAMESHWAR ASARAM BADAK AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO.11068 OF 2023 RAHUL DATTARAO RAJGURU AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS Mr.B.S.Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioners.

Mr.A.V.Deshmukh, AGP for Respondent/State.

- 2 - Mr.S.R.Yadav Lonikar, Advocate for the Respondent/Zilla Parishad, Parbhani.

Mr.V.C.Patil h/f Mr.U.B.Bondar, Advocate for the Respondent/Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad.

Mr.Ujwal Patil, Advocate for the Respondent/Zilla Parishad, Dhule. ( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.) DATE : SEPTEMBER 5, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

In all these matters, the Petitioners have an apprehension that they would not be considered eligible for online transfer (inter district) in the light of the GR dated 23.05.2023. 2.

The learned Advocates appearing on behalf of various Zilla Parishads and the learned AGP submit that, firstly, a Writ Petition should not be entertained on apprehensions. Secondly, the apprehensions of these Petitioners is misplaced. The transfers for the present academic year 2023-2024, are over. When the online portal opens for transfers for the academic year 2024-2025, the applications of the Petitioners would be considered strictly in accordance with the Rules and the Policies applicable, provided they are eligible.

- 3 - 3.

The learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that his apprehension is put to rest in the light of the aforesaid statements. 4.

In view of the above, all these Petitions are disposed off. ( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)