← Library
Bombay High CourtFA/1218/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Dr. Shilpa Kirankumar Bhandare And Another v. Dr. Kirankumar Shrikrushna Bhandare

2015-03-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre2 pages

29656.13fast -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 29656 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 962 OF 2014 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 963 OF 2014 Dr. Shilpa Kirankumar Bhandare & anr ...Appellants versus Dr. Kirankumar Shrikrushna Bhandare.

...Respondent

.....

Mr. A. M. Yadkikar, Advocate for appellants.

Mr. M. R. Sonawane, Advocate for respondent. .....

CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 27TH MARCH, 2015 ORAL ORDER :

.

This appeal can be conveniently disposed of by the consent of the parties, in view of the consent order passed by Principal Seat of Bombay High Court in Family Appeal 198/2013 on 20/02/2015 whereby, the issue of custody of child is also resolved in terms of clause 1 (b), (c) and (d).

2.

The said observations read thus:

"b) That the custody of the child Master Shardul will be remained with the Appellant, as right from beginning Master Shardul is residing along with his mother i.e. the Appellant. And the appellant himself

29656.13fast -2has given education to him. It is agreed that every once in a week i.e. on Saturday evening till Sunday evening Master Shardul will remain with the Respondent Dr. Kirankumar S. Bhandare. It is his responsibility to return the child at the home of Appellant in the evening of Sunday.

c) During the May Vacation as well as Diwali Vacation the respondent husband is entitled to take Master Shardul at his residential home for a period of few days (atleast five days) as per the mutual understanding by and between the parties.

d) That the Respondent husband will provide fix amount of Rs.60,000/- to the appellant per year on account of expenditure on Master Shardul for his education, clothes and medicine in two instalments." 3.

The present First Appeal stands disposed of in above terms.

4.

In view of disposal of the first appeal, civil applications do not survive, hence disposed of accordingly. [ N.W. SAMBRE, J. ] Tupe/27.03.15