Dilip Gurshidappa Kurle v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr District Collector, Latur And ORS

1 966 ca 8736-22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 966 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8736 OF 2022 IN FAST/29046/2021 WITH CA/8737/2022 IN FAST/29168/2021 SOMNATH MANMATH SWAMI AND ANR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR DISTRICT COLLECTOR, LATUR AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Dhanure Bramhanand M. AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. P. N. Kutti Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. S.C. Arora ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 23/08/2022.

P. C. :

1.

The learned counsel Mr. S.C. Arora submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of respondent No.3 - acquiring body and accordingly he waives service on behalf of respondent No.3.

2.

Heard rival submissions.

3.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 1617 days, which appears inordinate in nature. However, the applicants appear poor persons and therefore, considering their statutory right and for the reasons stated in the applications, the delay of 1617 days stands condoned, subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay. Accordingly, the applications stand disposed. 4.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-