Mohammad Alim Mohammad Yasin v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
{1} wp11616.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11616 OF 2017 Mohammad Alim Mohammad Yasin Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. S.K. Chavan, advocate for petitioner.
Mr. R.V. Dhawalkar, A.G.P. for respondents 1 and 3 to 9. Mr. S.T. Shelke, advocate for respondent no. 2. CORAM : R.M.BORDE & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.
DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2017 PER COURT:
Since the program of election has already been set in motion, in view of provisions of Article 243(O) of the Constitution of India, no interference is called for in the ongoing process of election. Keeping the option to avail of alternate remedies available in law at an appropriate stage, open for the petitioner, writ petition stands disposed of.
SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE dyb