Datta Bapurao Thakar v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Jalna And ORS

1 933 CA-16794.2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 933 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16794 OF 2022 IN FAST/27321/2022 DATTA BAPURAO THAKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS AND 938 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16813 OF 2022 IN FAST/27324/2022 RAMESHWAR NAMDEV MUNDHE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. S.M. Kakade, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. A.B. Chate, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

08.06.2023.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned in these applications, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. 3.

The learned AGP strongly opposed the applications on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods.

2 933 CA-16794.2022.odt 4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay. 4.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

5.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde