Kondiba @ Satish Hiraman Waghmare v. Shankar Vishnu Ingle And Another

{1} 19 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 19 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12935 OF 2015 IN FAST/29268/2015 KONDIBA @ SATISH HIRAMAN WAGHMARE

VERSUS

SHANKAR VISHNU INGLE AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ram S. Shinde Adv. for Respondent no. 1 : Mr. D. J. Patil Adv. for Respondent no. 2 : Mr. M.A. Deshmukh h/f Mr. S.G. Chapalgaonkar CORAM : K.K. SONAWANE, J.

DATE : 18th JUNE , 2018.

PER COURT:

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the application.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, there is no impediment to condone the delay of 34 days caused in filing the first appeal. Accordingly, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Delay caused for filing the first appeal is hereby condoned. Registry to take requisite steps for further process.

On registration of appeal, issue notice to respondents. Mr. Patil, Advocate waives notice for respondent No.1. Learned counsel Mr. Deshmukh, Advocate h/f. Mr. Chapalgaonkar,waives service for respondent No.2. Call for R. & P. from the concerned Tribunal. After receipt of R. & P. list the matter for admission in due course.

[K.K. SONAWANE] JUDGE.

grt/-