← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/11493/2023admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

The Executive Engineer v. Vikram Dagadu Khedekar

2024-04-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Mehare1 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:9299 8-CA-11493-23-d.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11493 OF 2023 IN FAST/27708/2023 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION DIV. JALNA

VERSUS

VIKRAM DAGDU KHEDKAR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Hemant U. Dhage Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Durgesh M. Pingale AGP for State : Smt. A. S. Mantri ...

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE : 26-04-2024 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Perused the application.

3.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the delay has not been properly explained.

4.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay deserves to be condoned. Hence, the order;

ORDER

i) The application is allowed.

ii) Delay caused in preferring the appeal stand condoned. iii) OfÏce to register the appeal according to law. iv) Issue notice to respondents.

v) Learned counsel waives service of notice for respondents/claimants.

( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE rrd