Umesh Bhagwanrao Rasal And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

20.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 20 WRIT PETITION NO. 11424 OF 2015 UMESH BHAGWANRAO RASAL AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Jadhav N. L.

AGP for Respondents 1 TO 3 State: Mrs. V. H. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. N. B. Surywawanshi Advocate for respondent No.4 :Mr. G.K. Thigle Naik

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & K. L. WADANE, JJ.

DATE :

21st December, 2016 ORDER:

1.

Mr. Suryawanshi, learned counsel for respondent No.5 submits that he has received Communication from the Registrar, District Court, Beed.

The said communication is issued by the Registrar, District Court, Beed as per orders of the Principal District Judge and Sessions Court, Beed upon instructions from the Chief Officer and the Deputy Engineer, Municipal Council Beed that the Municipal Council is constructing channel for disposing the sewerage, for the purpose of residents of Krantinagar, Beed. The said communication is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.

2.

We have heard Mr. Thigle, the learned counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation. We have also 1/2

20.odt heard Mr. Jadhav, the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3.

In view of that the grievance of the petitioners, who are residents of Krantinagar, Beed is taken care of. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

(K. L. WADANE, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) JPC 2/2