Baban Pralhad Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:26099 912.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

912 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1032 OF 2025 1.

Ganesh S/o Kashinath Misal.

2.

Balaji S/o Kashinath Misal.

... Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. P. P. More & Mr. Hari T. Kakde. APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S. B. Narwade. Advocate for Informant : Mr. Chetan Barku Chaudhari. ...

AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3518 OF 2025 IN BA/1032/2025 Baban Pralhad Jadhav.

... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others.

... Respondents ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Chetan Barku Chaudhari. APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S. B. Narwade. ...

CORAM :

SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE :

23rd September, 2025.

P.C.:

In Criminal Application No.3518 of 2025, the learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to assist the Public Prosecutor. The criminal application is disposed of.

912.odt In the bail application, after hearing the learned counsel for the respective parties, when this Court expressed disinclination to grant relief to the applicants, the learned counsel for applicants, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the bail application. Leave granted. The bail application stands disposed of as withdrawn.

The learned counsel for applicants further prayed that the trial may be expedited.

The learned Trial Court is directed to decide the case as expeditiously as possible, in any case within one year. However, it is clarified that if any matter is expedited either by the Honourable Supreme Court or this Court, then the Trial Court shall conclude that case first and then proceed further with this trial. Needless to mention that it is a sessions trial and word "sessions" means once it is started it shall not be stopped till it is concluded.

[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga