Nandini Deepak Patil And ORS v. Subba Rao R. Peraiah And ANR

24-CA-15023-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 24 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.15023 OF 2016 IN FAST/29742/2016 NANDINI DEEPAK PATIL AND ORS

VERSUS

SUBBA RAO R. PERAIAH AND ANR ....

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. V.C. Solshe h/f Mahesh H. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. R.F. Totla ....

CORAM : P.R. BORA, J.

DATED : 04th FABRUARY, 2019 PER COURT:- 1.

Heard Shri V.C. Solshe h/f Shri M.H. Patil, the learned counsel appearing for the applicants and Shri R.F. Totla appearing for respondent no.2. Respondent No.1 though served no one has caused appearance on his behalf.

2.

The delay of 289 days has occurred in filing the present appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, which according to me are just and sufficient. The delay of 289 days caused in filing the appeal is condoned.

3.

The appeal be registered in accordance with law. 4.

Civil application for condonation of delay stands disposed of. 5.

On registration of the appeal, issue notice to the respondents, returnable after six weeks. Shri Totla waives notice for respondent no.2. The appellant is permitted to serve the respondent no.1 by paper publication.

( P.R. BORA ) JUDGE Sudhir Rane