Sarlabai Vishwanath Patil And Another v. Sandu Kasam Tadvi And Others

sa119-15 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO.119 OF 2015 Sarlabai Vishwanath Patil & another APPELLANTS

VERSUS

Sandu Kasam Tadvi & others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. Subodh P. Shah, Advocate for the appellants Mr. V. D. Patnoorkar, Advocate for respondent No.1 .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 2 nd FEBRUARY, 2016 ORDER :

1.

Heard.

2.

The second appeal is admitted on following substantial question of law.

" Whether it can be said that the courts below had at all focused their attention to sub section

(2) of section 143 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code while deciding claims of the parties ?"

3.

Mr. Patnoorkar, learned advocate waives notice for respondent No.2 [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] drp/sa119-15

sa119-15 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10967 OF 2014 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO.119 OF 2015 Sarlabai Vishwanath Patil & another APPLICANTS

VERSUS

Sandu Kasam Tadvi & others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. Subodh P. Shah, Advocate for the applicants Mr. V. D. Patnoorkar, Advocate for respondent No.1 .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 2 nd FEBRUARY, 2016 ORDER :

1.

Heard learned advocates for the parties.

2.

It appears that there had been no interim relief at all during pendency of the proceedings.

3.

In view of the same, present civil application is not being entertained at this stage and stands disposed of as such. [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] drp/sa119-15