Sidram Maruti Jankar And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2024:BHC-AUG:13265 ca5291-20.doc drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5291 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.28621 OF 2019 Sidram Maruti Jankar and Another APPLICANTS

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Another RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. M. L. Dharashive, Advocate for the applicants Mr. S. B. Jadhav, AGP for respondent - State Mr. Mukul S. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No.2 .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 5 th JULY, 2024 ORDER :

1.

Heard.

2.

Learned advocate for respondent No.2 strenuously opposed the delay condonation application, stating that delay is not properly explained.

3.

For the reasons stated in application, delay is condoned. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B". 4.

Applicants - claimants shall not be entitled for interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period, if compensation is enhanced by this Court.

[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE drp/ca5291-20.doc