Mohd. Ismail Noor Mohd. Madna v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

1 Cr. WP / 1339 / 2022 +

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 963 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1339 OF 2022 LALU SURESH CHANDRASINGH @ LALU CHOTA BIHARI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 968 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1449 OF 2022 VIVEK BUDDHINATH MISHRA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 969 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1451 OF 2022 SUNIL RAJARAM MANNDAVKAR (C-5245)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 970 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1453 OF 2022 MOHD. ISMAIL NOOR MOHD. MADNA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Ms. Chate Sharada P. (WP/1339/2022, WP/1449/2022 and WP/1451/2022) Advocate for petitioner : Mr. Rupesh A. Jaiswal (WP/1453/2022) APPs for the respondent - State : Mr. B.V. Virdhe, Mr. S.D. Ghayal and Mr. S.P. Tiwari ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : 14 OCTOBER 2022

2 Cr. WP / 1339 / 2022 + PC :

All these petitions have been filed by the jail inmates on the ground that their applications for furlough leave are not being decided by the respondent no. 3 even after lapse of number of days. 2.

The learned APP, on instructions, submits that the respondent no. 3 - Deputy Inspector General of Police (Prison) Region Aurangabad will decide the applications of the petitioners within two weeks.

3.

The statement is accepted as an undertaking to the Court. 4.

In view of such statement, the petitions are disposed of. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE arp/