Rajendra Laxman Dandge v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

(1) 3-wp-5944-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 3 WRIT PETITION NO.5944 OF 2019 RAJENDRA LAXMAN DANDGE ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. Amit T. Ghute, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. B. Yawalkar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. ...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATED : 9th JULY, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 2.

2.

The petitioner has not arrayed as parties the persons against whom enquiry is sought to be conducted. The petitioner has filed application to the authority.

The petitioner, if it is permissible, may prosecute his application with the authority. In absence of any details, it will not be possible to pass any order.

3.

With the aforesaid observations, writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

(MANGESH S. PATIL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/July-19