← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10089/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Yashwantrao Himmatrao Salunke v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-01-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun M. Dhavale2 pages

1 99WP10089.2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 10089 OF 2018 Yashwantrao S/o. Himmatrao Salunke ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents ...........

Mr Yogesh B. Bolkar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr P. S. Patil, AGP for respondent/State .............

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 21ST JANUARY, 2019 ORAL ORDER:

1.

Mr Bolkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the impugned communication dt. 10.08.2016 is illegal, null and void. The petitioner is issued with the Project Affected Person's Certificate. His application ought to have been considered for appointment in Government Service suitable to his educational qualification.

2.

We have heard learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3.

In view of the judgment of the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Rajendra Pandurang Pagare & Anr vs. The State of

2 99WP10089.2018 Maharashtra & Ors. reported in 2009 (4) Mh. L. J. 961, the person possessing Project Affected Persons Certificate also has to come through proper competition. The direct appointment cannot be given.

4.

In the light of the above, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. [ A. M. DHAVALE ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE Punde