Dadasaheb Eknath Sable v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

- 1 - ca3566.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3566 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 29516 OF 2018 Dadasaheb Eknath Sable Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. M. K. Jadhav, Advocate holding for Mr. A. S. More, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. S. P. Deshmukh, AGP for respondents No. 1 and 2. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATE :9th DECEMBER, 2022.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

In the present case, delay in fling appeal against the impugned judgment and award passed in LAR No. 198/2018 is 28 days.

3.

Applicant claims that on account of fnancial diffculties, the appeal could not be fled in time.

- 2 - ca3566.19.odt 4.

Learned AGP for respondents No. 1 and 2 opposes the application.

5.

The justifcation given by the applicant for condonation of delay is satisfactory and hence delay stands condoned. Applicant would not be entitled for interest for 28 days. Appeal be registered. 6.

Application stands disposed of.

( R. M. JOSHI) Judge dyb