The State Of Maharashtra v. Nandkishor Indraj Agarwal

1 Cri.A.5576.13

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5576 OF 2013 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5575 OF 2013 The State of Maharashtra and another ...Applicants versus Nandkishor Indraj Agarwal another

...Respondents

.....

Mr. B.L. Dhas, Advocate for Applicants Mr. M.S. Shaikh, Advocate holding for Mr. Sachin S. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent .....

CORAM : A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.

DATED : 16th FEBRUARY, 2015 Order :- 1.

Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor for applicant-State and learned Advocate Mr. Shaikh for respondent-accused.

2.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that for administrative reasons there is delay of ten days. He prays for condonation of the same.

2 Cri.A.5576.13 3.

Learned Advocate for respondent-accused opposes the application saying that sufficient cause is not shown. 4.

Perused the present application as well as Criminal Application No. 5575 of 2013 and also nature of the offence. 5.

For the reasons stated in the application, in the interest of justice, the same is allowed. Delay stands condoned.

6.

Present Criminal Application stands disposed of. ( A.I.S. CHEEMA, J. ) MTK