Saroj Sudam Patil Thr S.M.Bhausaheb Trambak Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector Jalna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 957 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2140 OF 2020 IN FAST/25243/2018 RAVINDRA SHIVLAL AGARWAL SPM OMPRAKASH SHIVLAL AGRAWAL

VERSUS

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER M.I.W. JALGAON AND ANOTHER ...

AND 958 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2142 OF 2020 IN FAST/29551/2018 SAROJ SUDAM PATIL THR S.M.BHAUSAHEB TRAMBAK PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kale Ajeet B.

AGP for Respondents - State : Mr. S. N. Kendre, Mr. A. B. Chate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr.Dhongade Anilkumar B. ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 11.01.2023 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned therein which appear to be caused due to their financial crisis. The learned AGP as well as learned counsel for the Acquiring Body strongly opposed the applications on the ground that there is also circulation delay.

2.

Considering the statutory right of the applicants the delay periods mentioned in both these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid periods of delay and also for the delay in circulating the matter belatedly.

3.

Appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

4.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-