Alkabai Kailas Patil Thr S.M. Kailas Dashrath Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

1 1070 & 1074 ca 1821-20+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1070 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1821 OF 2020 IN FAST/29559/2018 NANDKOR BHIMSING PATIL

VERSUS

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQ. OFFICER M.I.W. JALGAON AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. B. K. Pawar h/f Mr. A. B. Kale AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. S. N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. B. K. Patil ...

AND 1074 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1832 OF 2020 IN FAST/29575/2018 ALKABAI KAILAS PATIL THR S.M. KAILAS DASHRATH PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. B. K. Pawar h/f Mr. A. B. Kale AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. S. N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. B. K. Patil ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 31/01/2023.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. The learned AGP as well as learned

2 1070 & 1074 ca 1821-20+ counsel for respondent / acquiring body strongly opposed the applications on the ground that there is also circulation delay. 3.

Considering the statutory right of the applicants, the applications are allowed and the delay periods in all these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the periods of aforesaid delay and also for the delay in circulating the matter belatedly.

4.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

5.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-