Dattusing Vitthalsing Rajput v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Osmanabad

901.WP.10028.14.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10028 OF 2014 Dattusing Vitthalsing Rajput ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Osmanabad.

Through Divisional Traffic Superintendent ..RESPONDENT ....

Mr. P.L. Shahane, Advocate along with Mr. Parag Shahane, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. D.S. Bagul, Advocate for respondent.

....

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATED : 26th FEBRUARY, 2016 ORAL ORDER :

1.

Mr. P.L. Shahane, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits on instructions that the petitioner does not desire to prosecute this petition and prays for leave to withdraw. 2.

Mr. Bagul, learned Counsel for the respondent has no objection in view of the unconditional withdrawal. S.S.DESHPANDE 1 / 2

901.WP.10028.14.doc 3.

In the light of the above, this petition is disposed off as withdrawn, unconditionally.

4.

Rule is discharged.

(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) S.S.DESHPANDE 2 / 2