Haribhau Bhanudas Sawade v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr S.L.A.O. Aurangabad And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 913 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12717 OF 2021 IN FAST/29928/2021 HARIBHAU BHANUDAS SAWADE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR S.L.A.O. AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER ...

AND 914 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.52 OF 2022 IN FAST/32845/2021 ABARAO GIRJABA NANGURDE (DIED) THR LRS YAMUNABAI (DIED) THR LRS MACHINDRA AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE S.L.A.O. AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER ...

AND 915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.62 OF 2022 IN FAST/33396/2021 RAMDAS NAMDEO NIMONE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE S.L.A.O. AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Ms. Sangeeta Pahune Patil h/f. Mr. Pahune Patil N.J AGP for Respondent/s - State : Mr. P. N. Kutti Mr. P. M. Kulkarni Mr. S. N. Kendre ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 19.10.2022

PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The respondent No. 2 -Acquiring Body though served, but remained absent. The respective applicants in all these applications are seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned in these applications. The delay appears to be caused due to their financial crisis. The learned AGP strongly opposed the applications on the ground that the delay is not properly explained. 2.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the delay periods as mentioned in these applications are condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the said delay periods.

3.

Appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

4.

The applications are disposed of accordingly. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-