Bhagyshri Bharat Pandit v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through, Principal Secretary Urban Development Department

1 928-CP-833-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 833 OF 2024 BHAGYSHRI BHARAT PANDIT

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Rakesh Nemichandji Jain, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondent/State Mr. Hanumant P. Jadhav, Advocate for Respondents No. 2 And 3 ...

CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI N. PATIL JADHAV, J.J.

DATE : 09th SEPTEMBER, 2025 PER COURT :

1.

Respondents have complied with the directions of this Court dated 10/06/2024 and have decided the representation of petitioner dated 18/04/2024.

2.

Learned advocate for petitioner claims that the petitioner was entitled for second ACP scheme. If the petitioner has any grievance about the order, she may avail the appropriate remedy available in law.

3.

In view of compliance of the order, contempt petition is disposed of.

(VAISHALI N. PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH