Rohinakhan Izharkhan And ORS v. Sitaram R. Rupla And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.15369 OF 2022 IN FAST/29284/2016 ROHINAKHAN IZHARKHAN AND OTHERS

VERSUS

SITARAM R. RUPLA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Mundhe Subhash V.

Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Jeevan R. Patil h/f. Mr. A.G.Kanade ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 15.11.2022 PER COURT :

The applicants are seeking permission to serve respondent No. 1 through paper publication since the notice issued to respondent No. 1 is awaited since long. Further, it appears that respondent No.1 is resident of Hyderabad. As such the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' subject to payment of necessary charges directly to the concerned newspaper.

2.

Application is disposed of accordingly.

3.

Stand over to 03.01.2023.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE ...

shp/-