Sunita Meghraj Randive v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:33290-DB 11100.2018WP+.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

14 WRIT PETITION NO. 11100 OF 2018 SHRUTIKA PRADIP SHIVGUNDE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Dheple S.R. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. G.A. Kulkarni Advocate for Respondent nos.2 and 3 : Ms. M.V. Narwade ...

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11105 OF 2018 SUNITA MEGHRAJ RANDIVE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Dheple S.R. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. G.A. Kulkarni Advocate for Respondent nos.2 and 3 : Ms. M.V. Narwade WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11106 OF 2018 SHAGUFTA ANJUM ABDUL SAMAD SHAIKH

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Dheple S.R. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. G.A. Kulkarni Advocate for Respondent nos.2 and 3:Ms.Manjushri Shendage-Narwade WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11101 OF 2018 NAVNATH BHAUSAHEB TODMAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Dheple S.R. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. G.A. Kulkarni Advocate for Respondent nos.2 and 3 : Mr. Aghav Avinash D. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11102 OF 2018 SHANTARAM SADASHIV PIMPALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Dheple S.R. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. G.A. Kulkarni Advocate for Respondent no.3 : Ms. M.V. Narwade

11100.2018WP+.odt WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11103 OF 2018 VAISHALI BHAUSAHEB KHARMALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Dheple S.R. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.G.A. Kulkarni WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11104 OF 2018 BAPU SARJERAO SHINDE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Dheple S.R. AGP for Respondent/State11 pt : Mr. G.A. Kulkarni Advocate for Respondent nos.2 and 3 : Mr. Kothari Pratik P. ...

CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

DATED : 1st DECEMBER, 2025.

ORDER :

.

By these petitions the petitioners have challenged the show-cause notices issued to them on 16.08.2018. It is well settled that challenge to the show-cause notice cannot be entertained in the writ jurisdiction. We are, therefore, not inclined to entertain the petitions. Writ petitions are disposed of.

2.

Respondents to take decision on merits, if the same is already not taken.

(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI,J.) sga