Ramchandra Punjiram Mule v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Collector, Parbhani And ORS

(1) 908 CA-6071.2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6071 OF 2022 IN FAST/30070/2021 WITH CA/6070/2022 IN FAST/30068/2021 RAMCHANDRA PUNJIRAM MULE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, PARBHANI AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Vitthal Bhise, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.V. Virdhe, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. G.S. Khaire, Advocate holding for Mr. S.S. Dande, Advocate for respondent No.3.

...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

26th April 2023.

ORDER:- 1.

Learned Counsel Mr. G.S. Khaire, holding for learned Counsel Mr. S.S. Dande waives notice for respondent No.3. 2.

Heard rival submissions.

3.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 2313 days in these applications, which appears to be caused due to their poor financial condition. 4.

The learned AGP as well as learned Counsel for respondent No.3 Acquiring Body strongly opposed the applications on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods.

(2) 908 CA-6071.2022.odt 5.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay.

6.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

7.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde