← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/13849/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Priyanka Satish Gejele v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others

2019-12-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote2 pages

(1) 111-wp-13849-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 111 WRIT PETITION NO.13849 OF 2019 PRIYANKA SATISH GEJELE ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. S. M. Vibhute, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. P. S. Patil, AGP for Respondents-State.

...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.

DATED : 10th DECEMBER, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

Though respondent nos.2 and 3 are served, none appears for respondent nos.2 and 3.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has completed B.E. (Electrical) Course. The validation proceeding in respect of the tribe claim of the petitioner is still pending.

3.

We have heard learned A.G.P. also.

4.

In case, validation proceeding in respect of the tribe claim of the petitioner is pending, then respondent no.4-Committee shall decide the said validation proceeding expeditiously and preferably within a period of four months from the

(2) 111-wp-13849-2019 date of appearance of the petitioner. The petitioner shall appear before the Committee on 16.12.2019.

5.

The respondents no.2 shall not withhold the result of the petitioner's examination on the ground that validation proceeding is pending. The respondents may issue mark sheet to the petitioner, however, shall not issue decree certificate unless and until the petitioner produces the validity certificate.

6.

Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

(AVINASH G. GHAROTE) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/December-19