← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/12172/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Hazrat Dina Shah Wali Dargar And Masjid Trust Deoli Through Secretary v. The State Of Mahrashtra And Others

2019-10-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi3 pages

(Order) (1) W.P. No. 12172 of 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

Writ Petition No. 12172 of 2019 District : Aurangabad Hazrat Dina Shah Wali Dargah & Masjid Trust, Deoli, Taluka Deoli, Dist. Wardha, Reg.No. MSBW/46/WRD/2009 [B­26/W], Through its elected managing committee & Secretary, Abdul Fahim s/o. Abdul Hamid Sheikh, Age : 41 years, Occupation : Business & Trustee, R/o. Deoli, Taluka Deoli, Dist. Wardha.

.. Petitioner.

versus

1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Minority Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

2. Chief Executive Officer, Maharashtra State Board of Wakf, Panchakki, Aurangabad.

3. Sattar Khan Mohammad Khan Pathan, Age : 70 years, Occupation : Business/ old trustee, R/o. Ward No.4, Ambedkar Nagar, Deoli, Taluka Deoli, Dist. Wardha.

.. Respondents.

(Order) (2) W.P. No. 12172 of 2019 ...........

Mr. Afzal Husain M. Vakil, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mrs. M.A. Deshpande, Additional Government Pleader, for respondent no.01.

...........

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.

DATE : 14TH OCTOBER 2019 ORAL ORDER :

01.

The petitioner seeks directions to respondent no.02 to decide the Change Report filed by him in respect of the elections held by the general body meeting of 'Hazrat Dina Shah Wali Dargah and Masjid Trust, Deoli, District Wardha', within a stipulated period.

02.

The petitioner may file an application with respondent no.02 i.e. Maharashtra State Board of Wakf to that effect. In case, such an application is filed, respondent no.02 shall decide the aforesaid Change Report, if not already decided, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within four months from the date of filing such application. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision that would be taken by the respondent no.02, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file fresh petition.

(Order) (3) W.P. No. 12172 of 2019 03.

With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.

( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi ) ( S.V. Gangapurwala ) JUDGE JUDGE ...........

puranik / WP12172.19