Vivek Vasudeorao Anagal v. Supriya Vivek Anagal

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.15879 OF 2013 IN FCAST NO.30738 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge's orders Mr.N.C.Garud, advocate for the Applicant.

Mr.R.S.Sarvadnya, advocate for Respondent.

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND A.M.BADAR,JJ.

Date : 22.01.2016.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

This is an application for condonation of delay. Mr.Garud, learned counsel submits that the applicant was not aware of the judgment and decree passed by the Family Court. He was not served with the summons.

Mr.Sarvadnya, learned counsel for the Respondent submits that the applicant was served by email and had the knowledge of the judgment and decree. It is a fact that the petitioner did not appear in the proceedings. In the application for condonation of delay, we are only considering the grounds stated for condonation that he is not aware of the judgment and order passed.

4.

In light of that, the Civil Application is allowed. Delay is condoned.

5.

The Civil Application is disposed of.

(A.M.BADAR,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.22.01.2016.

asp/office/Ca15879.13