Indrakumar Trimbakrao Kale v. The State Of Maharashtra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 980 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 702 OF 2023 IN WP/10114/2022 Indrakumar Trimbakrao Kale

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra and another ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Suryawanshi Kamlakar J. Addl. PP for the respondent - State : Mr. M.M. Nerlikar Advocate for respondent no. 2 : Mr. Vaibhav Deshmukh ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 03 JANUARY 2024 PC :

The parties are unanimous that the order of whcih the petitioner has been alleging contempt, has been duly complied with. 2.

Learned advocate for the petitioner, on written instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. He places on record a praecipe under the signature of the petitioner.

3.

The petition is disposed of.

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE arp/