Bombay High CourtCA/13724/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Kumari Sadrul Lail Lmohd Noor Ahemad v. The State Of Maharashtr And Others

2016-12-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde2 pages

{1} ca1372416.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13724 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10813 OF 2010 Kumari Sardul Lail Mohd. Noor Ahemad Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.P.B.Salunke, advocate for the applicant.

Mr.S.B.Yawalkar, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.K.D.Bade Patil, advocate for Respondent No.4 in Writ Petition. CORAM : R.M.BORDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 23rd December, 2016 PER COURT:

This is an application for recalling conditional order dated 24.06.2016, passed by this Court, dismissing the petition for want of prosecution in the event of failure of the petitioner to remove office objections.

Heard. For the reasons recorded in the application, application deserves to be allowed and same is accordingly allowed. The conditional order passed by this Court on 24.06.2016, is recalled. Delay caused in presenting the application stands condoned. Petitioner shall remove office objections within a period of six weeks from today. In the event of her failure to remove office objections within stipulated period, order passed in this Civil Application shall be deemed to have been recalled. (SANGITRAO S. PATIL) (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE JUDGE

{2} ca1372416.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10813 OF 2010 Kumari Sardul Lail Mohd. Noor Ahemad Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.P.B.Salunke, advocate for the applicant.

Mr.S.B.Yawalkar, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.K.D.Bade Patil, advocate for Respondent No.4 in Writ Petition. CORAM : R.M.BORDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 23rd December, 2016 PER COURT:

It is submitted by learned Counsel for the applicant that her result for B.D.S. III year examination has been withheld on account of her failure to submit validity certificate. The Writ Petition has been admitted and petitioner has been granted protection so as to facilitate her to pursue studies. In this view of the matter, Respondents No.4 and 5 are directed to declare result of the petitioner for B.D.S. III year examination, forthwith and allow her to appear for next year examination depending upon result of III year examination. Civil Application is disposed of.

(SANGITRAO S. PATIL) (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE JUDGE