Bansi Pandharinath Kakade v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 53WP12288.2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 12288 OF 2018 Bansi S/o. Pandharinath Kakade .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents .......

Mr P. A. Pisal, Advocate for the petitioner Ms Preeti Diggikar, AGP for respondent/State Mr A. R. Joshi, Advocate for respondent No. 4 Mr A. V. Hon, Advocate for respondents No. 5 & 6 .......

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 12293 OF 2018 Parashuram S/o. Rangnath Ganage .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents .......

Mr P. A. Pisal, Advocate for the petitioner Ms Preeti Diggikar, AGP for respondent/State Mr A. R. Joshi, Advocate for respondent No. 4 Mr A. V. Hon, Advocate for respondents No. 5 & 6 .......

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 21ST JANUARY, 2019 ORAL ORDER:

1.

It is submitted that the Grievance Committee has been constituted by the respondent No. 4 - University. The grievance of the petitioner can be considered by the Grievance Committee. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has

2 53WP12288.2018 already approached the Grievance Committee. In view of that, the Grievance Committee shall decide the application of the petitioner for grant leave encashment on its own merits after hearing the petitioner and the management expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months.

2.

The writ petition is disposed of . No costs.

[ A. M. DHAVALE ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE Punde