Kakasaheb S/O Baburao Thombre And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Collector, Jalna And ORS

1 920 & 921 ca 8867-22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 920 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8867 OF 2022 IN FAST/30311/2021 DWARKANATH HARIBA KADAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR, JALNA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. D. M. Pingale AGP for Respondents: Mr. A. A. Jagatkar ...

AND 921 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8943 OF 2022 IN FAST/30295/2021 KAKASAHEB S/O BABURAO THOMBRE AND ANR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, JALNA ANDORS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. D. M. Pingale AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 3: Mr. P. N. Kutti Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Ms. C.P. Kutti ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 04/10/2022.

P. C. :

1.

Heard.

2.

Issue notice to the respondents. The learned AGP waives notice for respondent Nos.1 & 3. The learned counsel Ms. C.P. Kutti waives service of notice for respondent No.2 - acquiring body.

2 920 & 921 ca 8867-22 3.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay as mentioned in these applications, which appears to be caused due to their poor fnancial condition.

4.

The learned AGP as well as the learned counsel for the acquiring body strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained.

5.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the respective delay periods as mentioned in the application are condoned subject to condition that the claimants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay periods. Appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any. The applications are accordingly disposed of.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-