M/S Prakalp Precast Concrete Products Thr Its Partner Chandrakant Hanumandas Malpani v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Midc Thr Its Regional Officer

2024:BHC-AUG:23741-DB -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10702 OF 2024 M/s Shiv Embroidery Manufacturing Company

VERSUS

Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation MIDC and another ...

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 10726 OF 2024 M/s. Prakalp Precast Concrete Products

Versus

Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) .....

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 10727 OF 2024 M/s. Prakalp Private Limited

Versus

Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. V.D. Salunke AGP for Respondents: Mr. V. M. Kagne Advocate for Respondent-M.I.D.C. : Mr. S.S. Dande .....

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATED : 1st OCTOBER, 2024.

PER COURT :- 1.

All these matters were heard yesterday. Since we noticed that the issue could be resolved, we granted an overnight pass over.

-22.

Considering the order that we propose to pass, we are not required to advert to the pleadings and contentions of the parties. Suffice it to say that, the M.I.D.C. has tendered individual calculations in each of these three Writ Petitions. The ready reference charts tendered to the court are marked as "X" in each of these Petitions. 3.

The learned counsel for the Petitioners submits, on instructions, that whatever the amounts have been calculated by the M.I.D.C, which are in terms of the Rules and the provisions applicable, these three Writ Petitioners would deposit 25% of the amount, on or before 15.10.2024 with the M.I.D.C. Further amount of 25% would be deposited by 30.10.2024 and the remaining 50% amount would be deposited, on or before 10.11.2024. 4.

The learned advocate for the M.I.D.C. submits that final receipts would be issued only after the last installment is paid and no extension of time would be granted. If there is any default in installments, the earlier installments paid, would be forfeited and further precipitative action would be initiated by the M.I.D.C. 5.

The learned counsel for the Petitioners submits, on instructions, that as these Petitioners are seriously accepting the charts tendered by the M.I.D.C and that there would be no default.

-36.

In view of above statement, these Writ Petitions are disposed off.

7.

Needless to state that the notices issued by the M.I.D.C. stand neutralized subject to the compliance of the above arrangement.

(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , J.) rlj/