Suhasini Subhashmule v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

( 1 ) cria5512.16a

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5512 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 227 OF 2015 Sau.Suhasini Subhash Mule ..

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..

Respondents Mr.G.V. Wani, advocate for the applicant.

Mr.A.R. Kale, A.P.P. for respondent/State.

CORAM : Z.A. HAQ,J.

DATED :

28.11.2016 P.C. :- .

Heard Mr. G.V. Wani, Advocate for the applicant and Mr.A.R. Kale, A.P.P. for non-applicant/State. 02.

The learned Advocate for the applicant states that prayer clause (C) in the application is added due to some bona fide mistake and inadvertently and there is no delay in filing the application praying for restoration of Criminal Revision Application.

03.

This Court passed an order on 30th August, 2016 to the effect that if the office objections were not removed till 20th September, 2016, the Criminal Revision

( 2 ) cria5512.16a Application shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court. The office objections were not removed within stipulated time and therefore the applicant filed this application praying that the order passed on 30th August, 2016 be recalled and the Criminal Revision Application be restored.

04.

Though the office notes did not show that the Criminal Revision Application stood dismissed in view of the order passed on 30th August, 2016, formal orders for restoration of Criminal Revision Application are passed, accepting the reasons stated in the present application. 05.

The Criminal Application is allowed.

[Z.A. HAQ,J.] /2016/ 16/ snk NOV cria5512.16a