← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/319/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Abhijeet Shankarrao Jagtap v. The Union Of India And Others

2015-01-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav2 pages

ca319.15.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 319 OF 2015 IN REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO. 29866 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7130 OF 2014 Abhijeet Shankarrao Jagtap .. APPLICANT

VERSUS

The Union of India & others.

.. RESPONDENTS Mr. V.D. Sapkal, advocate holding for Mr. A. B. Kale, advocate for applicant. Mr. S. B. Deshpande, Standing Counsel for Union of India. Ms. Anjali Dubey (Bajpai), advocate for respondents 2 and 3. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 328 OF 2015 IN REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO. 29871 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7131 OF 2014 Santosh Hanumantrao Upre .. APPLICANT

VERSUS

The Union of India & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. V. D. Sapkal, advocate holding for Mr. A. B. Kale, advocate for applicant. Mr. S. B. Deshpande, Standing Counsel for Union of India. Ms. Anjali Dubey (Bajpai), advocate for respondents 2 and 3. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 336 OF 2015 IN REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO. 29863 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7094 OF 2014 Sandeep Hanumantrao Upre .. APPLICANT

VERSUS

ca319.15.doc The Union of India & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. V. D. Sapkal, advocate holding for Mr. A. B. Kale, advocate for applicant. Mr. S.B. Deshpande, Standing Counsel for Union of India. Ms. Anjali Dubey (Bajpai), advocate for respondents 2 and 3. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 343 OF 2015 IN REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO. 29869 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7129 OF 2014 Yuvraj Rajendra Jagtap .. APPLICANT

VERSUS

Union of India & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. V. D. Sapkal, advocate holding for Mr. A. B. Kale, advocate for applicant. Mr. S. B. Deshpande, Standing Counsel for Union of India. Ms. Anjali Dubey (Bajpai), advocate for respondents 2 and 3. ===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : 22nd JANUARY, 2015.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

For the reasons stated in the application, applications seeking condonation of delay deserves to be allowed and the same are accordingly allowed. Delay occurred in presenting review applications stands condoned. Civil applications stand disposed of. ( V. K. JADHAV ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb