Dhanraj Bapurao Kadam v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Jalna And ORS

(1) 27- CA-5334-2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 27 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5334 OF 2022 IN FAST/30316/2021 DHANRAJ BAPURAO KADAM ....Applicant

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR, JALNA AND ORS .....Respondents .....

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Pingale Durgesh Madhukar AGP for Respondents: Mr. Rajdeep R. Raut .....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : MARCH 03, 2025 ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 713 days in filing the appeal, which appears to be caused due to his poor financial condition.

3.

The learned counsel for the respondent Acquiring Body remained absent. The learned AGP is formal party, but strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained and it is inordinate. 4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is

(2) 27- CA-5334-2022.odt allowed and the delay of 713 days in this application stands condoned subject to cost of Rs. 1000/- (Rupees One thousand) to be deposited with the Registry of this Court for utilization of High Court Dispensary within two weeks and also subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest and statutory benefit for the period of aforesaid delay. 5.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any, and deposit of cost.

6.

The application is accordingly disposed of .

7.

Call record and proceedings in appeal (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) Y.S. Kulkarni