The State Of Maharashtra And Another v. Jahagu Suka Gavit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 920 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14027 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 30524 OF 2015 WITH CA/14000/2015 IN FAST/30494/2015 WITH CA/14001/2015 IN FAST/30494/2015 WITH CA/14020/2015 IN FAST/30505/2015 WITH CA/14022/2015 IN FAST/30505/2015 WITH CA/14017/2015 IN FAST/30515/2015 WITH CA/14019/2015 IN FAST/30515/2015 WITH CA/14015/2015 IN FAST/30518/2015 WITH CA/14016/2015 IN FAST/30518/2015 WITH CA/14011/2015 IN FAST/30521/2015 WITH CA/14013/2015 IN FAST/30521/2015 WITH CA/14028/2015 IN FAST/30524/2015 WITH CA/14007/2015 IN FAST/30527/2015 WITH CA/14008/2015 IN FAST/30527/2015 WITH CA/14003/2015 IN FAST/30530/2015 WITH CA/14005/2015 IN FAST/30530/2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
BAKARAM SUKA GAVIT ...
Mr. B.V. Virdhe - AGP for Applicants, State Mr. S.A. Deshmukh h/f. Mr. M.K. Deshpande - Advocate for Respondent ....
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 6th July, 2023 PER COURT :
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14027 OF 2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14000 OF 2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14020 OF 2015 1/3
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14017 OF 2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14015 OF 2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14011 OF 2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14007 OF 2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14003 OF 2015 1.
Heard rival submissions.
2.
The appellant - State acquiring body in all these applications, is seeking condonation of delay of 1779 days, which appears to be cause due to obtaining sanctions at various stages. There is no strong objection from other side and therefore the delay of 1779 days in all these applications stands condoned.
3.
The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.
4.
The applications are accordingly disposed of. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14001 OF 2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14022 OF 2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14019 OF 2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14016 OF 2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14013 OF 2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14028 OF 2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14008 OF 2015 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14005 OF 2015 2/3
5.
It appears that, despite direction of this Court vide order dated 23rd October, 2015, the appellant - State acquiring body has not deposited the amounts of compensation in these applications.
6.
As such, the respective respondents - claimants in all these applications are at liberty to execute all the impugned awards by filing appropriate execution proceedings before the learned Reference Court.
[ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE 3/3