← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/63/2020delay condonatedrejected

Prakash Jivanrao Patil And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2022-11-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 913 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.63 OF 2020 IN X-OBJST/29643/2019 WITH CA/65/2020 IN X-OBJST/29645/2019 WITH CA/64/2020 IN X-OBJST/29648/2019 PRAKASH JIVANRAO PATIL AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Sakolkar Vijay G.

And Mr.H. B. Nandagavale.

AGP for Respondent - State : Mr. B.

V.

Virdhe ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 15.11.2022 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The respective applicants - claimants in all these applications are seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned therein for filing cross objections. The delay appears to be caused due to late receipt of compensation amount. Though the learned AGP strongly opposed the applications, but considering the statutory right of the applicants, the respective delay periods in all these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay periods if the amounts of compensation are enhanced.

2.

Cross-objections be registered after removal of office objections, if any.

3.

The applications are disposed of accordingly. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-