← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1035/2013disposed offdismissed for default

Komal Deosing Shinde v. The State Of Mah And ORS

2018-02-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice T.V. Nalawade,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal2 pages

W.P.NO.1035/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1035 OF 2013 Komal Deosing Shinde ...

PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others ...

RESPONDENTS .....

Shri S.A. Nagarsoge, Advocate for petitioner Shri R.V. Dasalkar, A.G.P. for State Shri V.C. Patil, Advocate holding for Shri U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4 .....

CORAM:

T.V. NALAWADE AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATED :

27th FEBRUARY, 2018.

ORAL ORDER :

1.

The petition is filed for giving directions to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, submitted for giving him promotion on the basis of the course completed by him, which according to him, is equivalent to B.Ed. course. He has placed reliance on some previous Government Resolutions of the Government.

2.

This Court had occasion to consider similar case in Writ Petition No.5943/2012 along with other petitions (Nagorao

W.P.NO.1035/2011 s/o Sakharam Deshpande Vs. The State of Maharashtra & others). This Court considered the subsequent Government Resolution dated 21.12.2011 and held that, the "Shiksha Visharad" Course completed from the Institute from Prayag is not equivalent to B.Ed. In view of the said finding of this Court, this Court holds that the petitioner is not entitled to get the promotion on the basis of the Course shown to be completed. There is no question of giving directions to the authorities to consider the representation of the petitioner on that basis. The petition stands dismissed.

( SUNIL K. KOTWAL ) ( T.V. NALAWADE ) JUDGE JUDGE fmp/