← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/12646/2023disposed off

Gajendra Shalikraom Sainy v. The Divisional Joint Registrar Co Operative Societies Nasik And Others

2023-10-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

1 ca 12646.2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 958 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12646 OF 2023 IN WPST/39849/2019 GAJENDRA SHALIKRAOM SAINY

VERSUS

THE DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIESNASIK AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant:

Mr. Shaikh Mohammad Naseer A AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. N. T. Bhagat ...

CORAM :ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE :18th OCTOBER, 2023 PER COURT:

1.

The present application is filed for restoration of the writ petition along with prayer for condonation of delay.

2.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that inadvertently the learned counsel could not notice the matter and, as such, the office objections remained to be removed and the order was passed by the Registrar (Judicial) refusing the registration of the writ petition. The learned counsel submits that the petition was

2 ca 12646.2023 filed by the another counsel and on enquiry by the present counsel he realised that the matter was dismissed as such he has moved the present restoration application.

3.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed, delay is condoned. The order passed by the Registrar (Judicial) of this court dated 23.08.2021 to the extent of the present applicant is quashed. The learned counsel for the applicant is granted four

(04) weeks time to remove office objections. In the event, the applicant fails to remove the office objections, the order of the registrar would stand restored.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] marathe