Jyotsana Dnyaneshwar Gunjal v. Rakesh Ramesh Mahajan And ANR

986-CA.13232-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 986 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13232 OF 2024 IN FAST/27490/2024 JYOTSANA DNYANESHWAR GUNJAL

VERSUS

RAKESH RAMESH MAHAJAN AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Patil Shrikant S. Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Temak Rahul B. ...

CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 19.06.2025 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard learned counsel Mr. Patil for applicants and learned counsel Mr. Temak for respondent No.1. None appears for respondent No.2.

2.

Considering the rival submissions of the parties and contents of civil application, I deem it appropriate to condone the delay.

3.

Civil application for delay is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B".

In First Appeal 4.

Admit.

986-CA.13232-24.odt 5.

Learned counsel Mr. Temak waives service of notice for respondent No.1.

6.

Call for Record and Proceedings from the concerned Court.

(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) ...

vmk/-